MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407904769 · doi:10.1049/icp.2024.3765

Transient challenges of a BESS grid-forming integration project

2025· article· en· W4407904769 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean-François Haché, Omar M. Saad, Habacuc Honvo, Pierre-Luc Martel, Rémi Desrochers, Abdoulaye D. Sy

Bibliographic record

VenueIET conference proceedings. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)GridComputer scienceMathematicsProgramming languageGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydro-Québec conducted a pilot project using a battery energy storage system (BESS) operating as the source of an islanded network. The BESS operates in grid-connected mode when it is charging from the grid. The BESS will be operated in islanded mode when the main power source is unavailable. The technical specifications required the BESS to replicate the behaviour of a synchronous generator in grid-forming operation. The approach was to perform electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulations, and to compare it to on-site testing with transient recorder and BESS fault tests. The transient studies and test records allowed the identification of some performance issues related to this technology that may be difficult to observe with another approach. The transient phenomena are as important as the steady state performances and should be the main design factor for these types of projects. The paper shows some challenges and issues related to transients that improved the BESS. It also shows some corrections and recommendations that shall be applied for future projects. Some of those challenges are:•Control algorithms during a fault.•Overvoltages observed when transitioning from a grid-connected to an islanded state.•Power oscillations due to control instabilities.•Differences between fault tests results and simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET conference proceedings.Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207