MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407904824 · doi:10.1049/icp.2024.3771

Blackstart capability demonstration of a battery energy storage system using EMT simulation and on-site measurement

2025· article· en· W4407904824 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre-Luc Martel, Omar M. Saad, Habacuc Honvo, Jean-François Haché, Charles R. Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueIET conference proceedings. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Computer scienceEnergy storageSystems engineeringReliability engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, climate change has led to increasingly severe weather phenomena, which have undermined the reliability of power grids. Considering this, the public is now demanding that grid operators accelerate the energy transition and the integration of new, cleaner technologies, while maintaining or even improving grid reliability. For this reason, Hydro-Quebec has launched a pilot project to install a battery energy storage system (BESS) in a remote village that is connected to the main transmission grid by a 60 km high-voltage transmission line. This line is at the end of its useful life and requires major work. Two of the main functionalities required for the BESS are to function in islanded mode with the local load and to have the ability to perform a cold load pick-up following a blackstart. Numerous EMTP simulations has demonstrated that the BESS can perform cold load pick-up and that its behaviour is different from a diesel generator (DG). The measurements taken during the network test show that the simulation models are fairly accurate for this type of phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET conference proceedings.Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207