MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application of geosynthetic barrier wall to containment of hydrocarbons in the Arctic

2005· book-chapter· en· W4407907095 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Toshifumi Mukunoki, Rowe R. Kerry, Bathurst Richard J.

Bibliographic record

VenueIOS Press eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContainment (computer programming)ArcticThe arcticEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the hydraulic conductivity of a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is assessed with respect to Jet Fuel A-1 (Arctic diesel). GCL specimens subjected to 0 and 5 freeze-thaw cycles and specimens recovered from a site on Brevoort Island in the Canadian Arctic after 3 years are examined. The GCL recovered from Brevoort Island had the lowest hydraulic conductivity with respect to de-aired water. Freeze-thaw cycles did not have a negative impact on hydraulic conductivity with respect to de-aired water. Freeze-thaw cycles did increase the hydraulic conductivity, k, with respect to Jet Fuel A-1. However, the hydraulic conductivity was still very low and the results suggest that the GCL can be expected to perform well as a hydraulic barrier in the medium term with respect to the effects of both freeze-thaw and permeation with Jet A-1. More testing is needed to assess long term performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOS Press eBooksSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207