MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407908355 · doi:10.1111/apa.70038

Severe Neonatal Morbidity Across Gestational Age: Monitoring Infants at High Risk of Mortality

2025· article· en· W4407908355 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Neda Razaz, Jenny Bolk, Hillary L. Graham, Eleni Tsamantioti, Kari Johansson, Martina Persson, Mikael Norman

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Paediatrica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchStockholm läns landstingVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsMedicineGestational agePediatricsGestationRelative riskConfidence intervalNeonatal resuscitationObstetricsPregnancyResuscitationSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: This study aimed to quantify temporal trends in severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) and examine its association with neonatal mortality, stratified by gestational age. METHODS: This study included all live births in Sweden from 2007 to 2021. SNM types and subtypes were identified based on diagnoses and procedure codes for births ≥ 22 weeks' gestation, including complications within 27 days. Rates were calculated by gestational age, and temporal changes were assessed using rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Adjusted relative risks (aRR) of neonatal death were also estimated. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2021, 47,048 (2.8%) cases of SNM were identified, rising from 2.2% in 2007 to 3.6% in 2021, mainly due to increased resuscitation/mechanical ventilation rates across all gestational ages. Infections rose among infants born at ≥ 37 weeks (0.59% in 2007-2011 to 0.77% in 2017-2021, RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.24-1.37), but declined in those born at 22-31 weeks. Neurological morbidity, especially seizures, slightly increased in term and moderately preterm infants. Except for infants born at 22-27 weeks, neonatal mortality risks among infants with SNM were higher in infants with greater gestational ages. CONCLUSION: Despite advances in neonatal care, SNM prevalence in Sweden increased from 2007 to 2021 across all gestational ages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa PaediatricaSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207