Mapping snoRNA-target RNA interactions in an RNA-binding protein-dependent manner with chimeric eCLIP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are non-coding RNAs that function in ribosome and spliceosome biogenesis, primarily by guiding modifying enzymes to specific sites on ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and spliceosomal RNA (snRNA). However, many orphan snoRNAs remain uncharacterized, with unidentified or unvalidated targets, and studies on additional snoRNA-associated proteins are limited. RESULTS: We adapted an enhanced chimeric eCLIP approach to comprehensively profile snoRNA-target RNA interactions using both core and accessory snoRNA-binding proteins as baits. Using core snoRNA-binding proteins, we confirmed most annotated snoRNA-rRNA and snoRNA-snRNA interactions in mouse and human cell lines and called novel, high-confidence interactions for orphan snoRNAs. While some of these interactions result in chemical modification, others may have modification-independent functions. We showed that snoRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes containing certain accessory proteins, like WDR43 and NOLC1, enriched for specific subsets of snoRNA-target RNA interactions with distinct roles in ribosome and spliceosome biogenesis. Notably, we discovered that SNORD89 guides 2'-O-methylation at two neighboring sites in U2 snRNA that fine-tune splice site recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Chimeric eCLIP of snoRNA-associating proteins enables a comprehensive framework for studying snoRNA-target interactions in an RNA-binding protein-dependent manner, revealing novel interactions and regulatory roles in RNA biogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".