MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407913809 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01577-24

A streamlined procedure for advancing the detection and isolation of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> from artificially contaminated ground beef in a single working day

2025· article· en· W4407913809 on OpenAlexaff
Min Lin, Hanhong Dan, Jiewen Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsListeria monocytogenesContaminationImmunomagnetic separationBiologyFood scienceMicrobiologyCentrifugationIsolation (microbiology)ChromatographyBacteriaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Listeria monocytogenes , a rod-shaped Gram-positive bacterium widely distributed in nature, can contaminate foods and represents a foodborne pathogen of public health significance causing a high mortality rate of 20%–30%. Rapid and reliable identification of foods and food-processing environments contaminated with L. monocytogenes is a crucial step in implementing effective intervention strategies to ensure food safety and limit the transmission of bacteria to humans. This study designed and refined a practical workflow to streamline and accelerate the detection of a low level of L. monocytogenes present in ground beef. The workflow coupled an abbreviated 5 h culture enrichment in PALCAM liquid medium with physical separation (filtration and centrifugation) to preprocess enrichment samples. Specific capture was achieved using magnetic separation with a bacteriophage endolysin-derived cell wall-binding domain in a Hyglos Listeria capture kit. Molecular detection was performed using a MicroSEQ L. monocytogenes RTi-PCR detection kit combined with a nested PCR strategy. Preprocessing of enrichment culture samples using a multi-stage filtration system constructed for the study or commercially available BagFilter Pull-up filter bags, in conjunction with centrifugation, enabled the recovery of ~30 colony-forming units (CFUs) from the enrichment culture of a 25 g ground beef sample artificially contaminated with 1 CFU of L. monocytogenes . Integration of magnetic separation into the workflow for capturing L. monocytogenes cells specifically from preprocessed samples and further cleaning up the samples yielded bacterial counts similar to those obtained by direct plating of preprocessed samples. The RTi-PCR-based molecular detection method integrated into the workflow was capable of detecting pure cultures of L. monocytogenes as low as 12.5 CFUs. Evaluation of the workflow using artificially ground beef demonstrated the consistent detection of L. monocytogenes within an 8 h workday in a 25 g sample unit containing the cell count as low as 2 CFU following a 5 h culture enrichment. IMPORTANCE Consuming foods contaminated with the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes can lead to the development of human listeriosis, a severe and life-threatening foodborne illness. Timely detection of L. monocytogenes present at a low level in foods and food processing environments is a necessary measure to prevent the spread of the Listeria -associated illness. This study designed and evaluated a multi-step workflow for testing L. monocytogenes in artificially contaminated food samples. The workflow was composed of a short 5 h culture enrichment, filtration-based sample preprocessing, magnetic separation, a single-tube nested RTi-PCR, and culture plating. It allowed L. monocytogenes to be detected within 8 h from a 25 g ground beef sample containing the target cells as low as 2 colony-forming units, significantly improving and streamlining the detection methods for this important foodborne pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyFrench-language works237,207