MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407923191 · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101975

Estimation of the pooled mean blood lead levels of Indian children: Evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4407923191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisSystematic errorStatisticsEstimationMedicineInternal medicineMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent systematic review reported very high pooled estimates of blood lead levels (BLLs) for Indian children. Current study aimed at systematically pooling the BLLs of Indian children (aged ≤ 14 years). Further, explore the time trend of BLLs with respect to implementing the ban on the use of Pb-petrol (i.e.2000) and a decade later (2010). Observational studies documenting the BLL in Indian children (aged ≤ 14 years) from PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and Embase digital databases from inception to August 2024 were systematically reviewed. Detailed protocol is available at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022382835). Pooled mean BLL was estimated using the random-effects model and conventional- I 2 statistics to assess the heterogeneity, while the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for bias assessment. Sub-group, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed where data permitted. Observations from 65 reports (51 original studies) revealed pooled BLL of 10.4 (95 % CI: 9.55–11.2) µg/dL with a trend of gradual reduction during the last 3 decades. Subgroup analysis revealed the high risk (with known Pb exposure) children had BLL of 14.3 (12.3–16.2) µg/dL, while that of the low risk (no known Pb exposure) is 8.71 (7.71–9.71) µg/dL. Only the low risk group exhibited a time trend of a gradual reduction in BLL. Notably, the review observed high heterogeneity. A progressive decline in Pb burden with respect to the national ban on leaded petrol was observed. However, present observations emphasize remedial actions toward non-occupational Pb exposure particularly among high risk Pb group, such as periodic BLL surveys. • Pooled data indicates Indian children's mean BLL is above the reference level. • BLLs have gradually declined following the ban on leaded petrol in India. • Higher BLLs observed in children with known/high Pb exposure risk versus low risk. • Currently available evidences are predominantly low quality and carried high heterogeneity. • National programs are effective and required on long run to reduce Pb pollution

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it