MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407924474 · doi:10.3390/a18030128

Using Coherent Hemodynamic Spectroscopy Model to Investigate Cardiac Arrest

2025· article· en· W4407924474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine InstituteNorth York General HospitalToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodynamicsSpectroscopyCardiologyInternal medicineComputer sciencePhysicsMaterials scienceNuclear engineeringMedicineEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Coherent Hemodynamic Spectroscopy (CHS) model provides a quantitative framework for modeling cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism, particularly in response to small physiological perturbations. However, in its original approximate formulation it was limited to conditions where parameter changes were constrained to 10–20%, making it unsuitable for modeling extreme physiological disruptions such as cardiac arrest. In this study, we present a detailed discussion of the algorithm using the complete CHS model, which extends the original framework by solving partial differential equations without approximations to handle large non-periodic perturbations. This model was applied to data from a previously published cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) study in pigs, where cerebral blood flow changed by 100%. While our prior work demonstrated the utility of this approach for analyzing cerebral microvascular and metabolic parameters, it did not include the algorithmic details necessary for reproducibility and broader application. Here, we address this gap by describing the algorithm’s workflow, including the use of non-linear multivariate optimization, and its ability to recover multiple physiological variables, such as the capillary and venule oxygen saturations, and parameters, such as the capillary oxygen diffusion rate, and arterial oxygen saturation. The latter can be valuable when the pulse oximetry measurements are unavailable due to unstable, weak or absent pulse. This study underscores the importance of non-linear modeling in advancing the application of CHS to extreme physiological conditions and highlights its potential for translational research and clinical innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it