MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407924513 · doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101761

Aortoenteric fistula following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2025· article· en· W4407924513 on OpenAlex
Laura Tupper-Ring, Lauren Mills, Joey McDonald, Chris Lightfoot, Scott Livingstone, Samuel Jessula

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortoenteric fistulaLaparoscopic cholecystectomyGeneral surgeryCholecystectomyLaparoscopySurgeryAbdominal aortic aneurysmAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of a 71-year-old woman with gastrointestinal bleeding 21 days after undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Initial imaging revealed a pseudoaneurysm of nonaneurysmal infrarenal aorta, managed with an endovascular stent graft. Despite this procedure, recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding persisted, prompting further imaging that identified an aortoenteric fistula complicated by endograft infection. The fistula likely resulted from an iatrogenic injury caused by trocar entry during the cholecystectomy. Definitive surgical repair involved resection of the infected endograft and reconstruction with a bovine pericardium conduit. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of aortoenteric fistulas, endograft infection risks, and considerations in selecting conduits for reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it