MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407930003 · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465816

RT-Pred: A web server for accurate, customized liquid chromatography retention time prediction of chemicals

2025· article· en· W4407930003 on OpenAlexaff
Mahi Zakir, Marcia LeVatte, David S. Wishart

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatography A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRetention timeChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• RT-Pred uses retention behavior of compounds to predict their retention times. • Uses advanced machine learning for accurate RT predictions and model creation. • Adaptable to any liquid chromatography setup for custom model building. • Achieves correlation coefficients of 0.95 (training) and 0.91 (validation). • Free, user-friendly, searchable and downloadable web-based tool. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) together with mass spectrometry (MS) is routinely used to separate, identify and quantify chemicals. HPLC data also provides retention time (RT) which can be aligned with structural data. Recent developments in machine learning (ML) have improved our ability to predict RTs from known or postulated chemical structures, allowing RT data to be used more effectively in LC-MS-based compound identification. However, RT data is highly specific to each chromatographic method (CM) and hundreds of different CMs with interdependent parameters are used in separations. This has limited the application of ML-based RT predictions in compound identification. Here we introduce an easy-to-use RT prediction webserver (called RT-Pred) that predicts RTs for molecules across most chromatographic setups. RT-Pred not only supports its own in-house CM-specific RT predictors, it allows users to easily train a custom RT-Pred model using their own RT data on their own CM and to predict RTs with that custom model. RT-Pred also supports RT and compound searches against its own database of millions of predicted RTs spanning >40 different CMs. RT-Pred is also uniquely capable of accurately identifying compounds that will elute in the void volume or be retained on the column. Including this void/retained/eluted classifier significantly improves RT-Pred's performance. Tests indicate that RT-Pred had an average coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.95 over 20 different CMs. Comparisons of RT-Pred against other RT predictors showed that RT-Pred achieved lower mean absolute errors and higher R² scores than any other published RT predictor. RT-Pred is freely available at https://rtpred.ca .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chromatography ASame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207