Geographic distributions in Chromosera species—continental and oceanic barriers, including a new species, a new variety and a new combination
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromosera cyanophylla was initially described from Europe and, when it was named type of the genus, was thought to be distributed throughout Europe and North America. Molecular phylogenies revealed that Chromosera “cyanophylla” from eastern and western North America represent two separate species and that neither is conspecific with European C. cyanophylla nor with the more recently described C. ambigua. Here we describe a new species from western North America as Chromosera loreleiae. We resurrect the species Peck described from eastern North America as Agaricus lilacifolius by recombining it in Chromosera and describe a new lilac variety lacking yellow pigments. The range of C. cyanophylla s.s. across eastern Eurasia including China is confirmed. Chromosera citrinopallida, described from Washington state, USA, comprised one clade in Washington that we infer is C. citrinopallida s.s. and a separate circumarctic clade distributed in Scandinavia, Iceland and Alaska.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it