MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407932374 · doi:10.1130/g52887.1

The Neoproterozoic glacial broom

2025· article· en· W4407932374 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher L. Kirkland, R.A. Strachan, Donnelly B. Archibald, J. Brendan Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroomGeologyGlacial periodPaleontologyEarth scienceArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neoproterozoic snowball Earth events reflect globally frigid conditions thought to have stimulated changes in geochemical cycling with planetary biotic response. We investigated the impact of these events on sediment dynamics, focusing on the detrital zircon record within the Dalradian Supergroup of Scotland and Ireland. Utilizing U-Pb detrital zircon ages, we analyzed changes in sediment provenance throughout the stratigraphy via bootstrapped variance metrics. The coefficient of variance for the detrital zircon load exhibits a first-order increase stratigraphically upward, with marked changes at glaciogenic layers. Points of increased variance align with inputs of older detritus compared to lower, preglacial stratigraphic levels, suggesting intensified erosion and downcutting linked to wet-based glacial activity, with postglacial sediment redistribution. Average detrital zircon apparent density also changes through the stratigraphy, with implications for uranium cycling from the continents into the oceans. While early Ediacaran shale geochemistry implies postglacial oceanic oxygenation, loss of proportionally more uranium-rich detrital zircon across glaciogenic layers suggests that modification to continental weathering also fundamentally contributed to Neoproterozoic geochemical shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207