MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407932515 · doi:10.2196/65649

The Effectiveness of a Race-Based Stress Reduction Intervention on Improving Stress-Related Symptoms and Inflammation in African American Women at Risk for Cardiometabolic Disease: Protocol for Recruitment and Intervention for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4407932515 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen L. Saban, Cara Joyce, Alexandria Jones‐Patten, Linda Witek Janusek, Dina Tell, Paula de la Peña, Darnell Motley, Lamise Shawahin, Laura Prescott, Stephanie Potts‐Thompson, Jacquelyn Y. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)MedicineDiseaseAfrican americanStress reductionStress managementRace (biology)Stress (linguistics)Protocol (science)InflammationPhysical therapyGerontologyAlternative medicineClinical psychologyNursingInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the prevalence of cardiometabolic disease (CMD) in African American women has risen; the risk also increases with age, in comparison to men. Evidence demonstrates that stressful life events, including experiences of racism and perceived discrimination, contribute substantially to inflammatory diseases, such as CMD. Despite this evidence, few evidence-based interventions are available to assist individuals from minoritized communities in coping with the chronic stress related to their racial or ethnic identity. OBJECTIVE: Our proposed randomized controlled trial will test a novel, race-based intervention tailored to African American women, called Resilience, Stress, and Ethnicity (RiSE). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we will randomize participants 1:1 to the 8-week, group-based RiSE program (intervention) or a health education program (active control group). Both programs will consist of synchronous classes on Zoom and will be led by experts. The primary end point will be stress at 6 months after the intervention, and the efficacy of RiSE will be evaluated for improving stress-related symptoms (current perceived stress, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and sleep disturbance), improving coping strategies, and reducing inflammatory burden in African American women at risk for CMD. Validated survey measures and inflammatory biomarkers will be assessed at baseline, midintervention, intervention completion, and 6 months after the intervention, and differences over time by intervention will be evaluated using mixed effects models. RESULTS: This study was funded by the National Institute on Aging on March 30, 2023, with recruitment and enrollment beginning in October 2023. The study is underway, with 120 participants enrolled as of March 2025. CONCLUSIONS: This study will be one of the first to examine a race-based stress reduction intervention in African American women and has the potential to improve the health of minoritized groups faced with chronic stress associated with experiencing racism and discrimination. We anticipate that RiSE will reduce stress-related symptoms, enhance adaptive coping, and reduce inflammation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05902741; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05902741.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.433 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207