MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407934007 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.060

Identification of temporal targets for closed-loop personalized brain stimulation in psychiatry

2025· article· en· W4407934007 on OpenAlexaff
Brigitte Zrenner, Daniel M. Blumberger, Christoph Zrenner

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosed loopBrain stimulationNeuroscienceIdentification (biology)StimulationDeep brain stimulationPsychologyMedicineComputer scienceBiologyInternal medicineEngineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep is far more than a period of inactivity; it is a dynamic state where complex neural rhythms unfold, providing critical insights into our overall health.These brain oscillations, which define various stages of sleep, are increasingly understood not only as markers of sleep architecture but also as key contributors to its restorative functions.Dr. Lustenberger and her team have pioneered innovative techniques, using both stationary and portable technologies to modulate brain oscillations during sleep via EEG-feedbackcontrolled auditory stimulation.This technique has been successfully applied in both controlled laboratory environments and in everyday home settings.Their work aims to unravel the role of sleep oscillations in brain and body processes, while paving the way for the development of non-invasive sleep interventions.In this talk, Dr. Lustenberger will provide an overview of how auditory stimulation can enhance the sleep oscillations characteristic of deep sleep, with implications for cardiovascular health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207