MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407934825 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.046

Magnus Neuromodulation System with Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) as a Personalized Continuation Therapy for Depression: An Open-Label Pilot Trial

2025· article· en· W4407934825 on OpenAlexaff
Katy H. Stimpson, Tamsin Ford, Adi Maron‐Katz, Michael Feyder, Danielle D. DeSouza, David Carreon, Eleanor Cole, Brandon S. Bentzley

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMagnus Chemicals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromodulationDepression (economics)ContinuationOpen labelMedicineRandomized controlled trialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyComputer scienceInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Brain oscillations, which reflect the organized activity of neuronal assemblies, play a crucial role in brain function and are altered in conditions such as depression, schizophrenia, and stroke.While transcranial electric currents have shown therapeutic potential in modulating these oscillations, the direct effects on brain dynamics during stimulation remain elusive due to the inability to record oscillatory changes concurrently.Moreover, inability to assess brain oscillations during stimulation renders closed-loop paradigms unfeasible.Here, we introduce a promising approach to overcome this limitation and highlight the possibility of influencing brain activity and behavior beyond the motor system.Objectives/Hypothesis: In a series of experiments involving healthy volunteers, we used closed-loop amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (CLAM-tACS) to modulate brain oscillations in motor regions and beyond.Specifically, we investigated whether phaselocked, state-dependent stimulation can enhance or suppress oscillatory activity and related brain functions across different paradigms.Methods: In a series of studies, we employed CLAM-tACS that combines artifact attenuation with real-time phase-tracking and stimulation of brain rhythms.Oscillations across different frequency bands, such as theta, frontoparietal alpha or central mu, were targeted.Results: Across multiple experiments, phase-dependent enhancement and suppression of oscillations were observed.We found consistent effects on behavioral outcome measures that correlated with specific stimulation phase angles.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CLAM-tACS can be effectively applied beyond the motor system to modulate brain function and behavior.However, limitations of the approach have to be further explored and application in clinical populations tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207