Cell Type-Agnostic Transcriptomic Signatures Enable Uniform Comparisons of Neurodevelopment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Single-cell transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding of neurodevelopmental cell identities, yet, predicting a cell type’s developmental state from its transcriptome remains a challenge. We perform a meta-analysis of developing human brain datasets comprising over 2.8 million cells, identifying both tissue-level and cell-autonomous predictors of developmental age. While tissue composition predicts age within individual studies, it fails to generalize, whereas specific cell type proportions reliably track developmental time across datasets. Training regularized regression models to infer cell-autonomous maturation, we find that a cell type-agnostic model achieves the highest accuracy (error = 2.6 weeks), robustly capturing developmental dynamics across diverse cell types and datasets. This model generalizes to human neural organoids, accurately predicting normal developmental trajectories (R = 0.91) and disease-induced shifts in vitro . Furthermore, it extends to the developing mouse brain, revealing an accelerated developmental tempo relative to humans. Our work provides a unified framework for comparing neurodevelopment across contexts, model systems, and species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".