MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407937729 · doi:10.1109/thms.2025.3538098

Time Series Signal Analysis With Information Granulation Based on Permutation Entropy: An Application to Electroencephalography Signals

2025· article· en· W4407937729 on OpenAlexaff
Youpeng Yang, Sanghyuk Lee, Haolan Zhang, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographySIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Series (stratigraphy)Computer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Signal processingPermutation (music)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionData miningMathematicsPsychologyNeuroscienceAcousticsPhysicsBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we reported a novel granulation method composed of complexity information based on permutation entropy (PeEn). This method aims to recognize the electroencephalography (EEG) patterns using this proposed granulation method. First, we define the complexity information for granular computing by a technique with fast calculation, i.e., PeEn. Then, the information granule can be constructed based on the time domain information, which completes complexity information. Together with the support vector machine algorithm, the proposed granulation method outperformed the existing classification methods in accuracy. It is utilized by classifying three motor imaginary EEG signals. Two of them are binary-class datasets, i.e., one dataset includes two-hand actions, and another includes hand and foot actions. The third dataset is multiclass, including two hands and two feet actions. In addition, the proposed granulation method overcomes the difficulties in cross-individual cases when classifying the EEG signals with a higher accuracy than the existing methods. Meanwhile, this classification procedure makes it interpretable and has a high performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine SystemsSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207