La fiction contemporaine en question : entre poétique du bouleversement et réflexion politique dans L’inquiétude d’être au monde et Vies pøtentielles de Camille de Toledo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Camille de Toledo offre, dans ses dispositifs narratifs hybrides, une perspective différente sur l’engagement par rapport à la fiction, en scrutant en parallèle le terrain des filiations littéraires face aux défis politiques et (po)ét(h)iques actuels. D’un point de vue interdisciplinaire, nous analysons l’imaginaire d’une crise visant en égale mesure la pensée européenne et les enjeux fictionnels dans le contexte d’une valorisation du pop-fascim littéraire et de l’esthétisation du discours politique. Notre article vise, premièrement, l’analyse des ouvrages tolediens à caractère intermédial, qui témoignent de la dynamique socioculturelle et politique du XXIe siècle (hanté par les fantômes cruels du XXe), et, deuxièmement, la manière dont de Toledo construit des fictions contemporaines s’inscrivant dans le paradigme de ces productions artistiques qui relèvent le défi d’une problématisation particulière des aspects politiques et historiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".