MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407943693 · doi:10.1016/j.aichem.2025.100086

Data-driven modelling of corrosion behaviour in coated porous transport layers for PEM water electrolyzers

2025· article· en· W4407943693 on OpenAlexafffund
Pramoth Varsan Madhavan, Leila Moradizadeh, Samaneh Shahgaldi, Xianguo Li

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFedDev OntarioNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellCorrosionPorosityMaterials scienceWater transportChemical engineeringEnvironmental scienceFuel cellsComposite materialEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringWater flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Green hydrogen, produced through water electrolysis powered by renewable energy, is essential for a sustainable energy future. However, proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolyzers face durability issues, particularly corrosion of porous transport layers (PTLs), which limits their widespread commercialization. Protective coatings are used to mitigate PTL corrosion and improve durability. Traditional approaches to predicting coating performance in terms of corrosion resistance rely on extensive experimentation and intricate physical-electrochemical modelling, resulting in substantial time and cost. This study is the first to apply machine learning (ML) models to predict the corrosion behaviour of PTL coatings with varying alloy compositions for PEM water electrolyzers. Using Nb-Ta coated PTLs with different alloying ratios, coating performance is evaluated through potentiostatic polarization and end-of-life (EOL) tests. The data is split into two datasets: one for predicting corrosion current density and the other for predicting EOL voltage. Extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and artificial neural network (ANN) models are developed. To assess the models, mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) are used as loss functions. The ANN model with the MSE loss function achieved the best performance, with an R 2 of 0.993 for corrosion current density. Additionally, the ANN model with a 0.1 dropout probability and MSE loss function resulted in an R 2 of 0.966 for EOL voltage predictions, outperforming the XGB models. These findings demonstrate the ability of ML models to accurately predict the anti-corrosion performance of PTL coatings, facilitating a faster approach to optimizing PTL coating compositions for PEM water electrolyzer applications. • Developed ML models for predicting PTL performance in PEM water electrolyzers. • XGB and ANN models predicted corrosion current density with accuracy of R 2 > 0.98. • ANN-MSE-DRPT yielded the best end-of-life voltage prediction (R 2 > 0.96). • Data-based models present promising solutions for advancing PTL coating development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ChemistrySame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207