MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407945478 · doi:10.1111/febs.70034

Circadian clock genes and cell survival in bipolar disorder: Insights into lithium responsiveness and molecular mechanisms in patient‐derived neural progenitor cells and mouse neurons

2025· article· en· W4407945478 on OpenAlexaff
Himanshu Mishra, Heather Wei, Melissa LeRoux, Daniel Ko, Kayla E. Rohr, Caroline M. Nievergelt, Adam X. Maihofer, Paul D. Shilling, Martin Alda, Wade H. Berrettini, William Coryell, Mark A. Frye, Elliot S. Gershon, Melvin G. McInnis, John I. Nürnberger, Ketil J. Øedegaard, Peter P. Zandi, John R. Kelsoe, Michael J. McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare SystemU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsProgenitor cellCircadian rhythmNeural stem cellLithium (medication)BiologyCell biologyCircadian clockMolecular clockGeneProgenitorBipolar disorderNeuroscienceCLOCKStem cellEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by disrupted circadian rhythms and neuronal loss. Lithium amplifies circadian rhythms and is neuroprotective, indicating mechanistic overlap across cellular systems. We examined the role of neuroprotection in determining lithium response and how circadian clock genes regulate apoptosis. In stem-cell-derived neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) from BD patients, and in immortalized mouse hippocampal neurons, lithium was neuroprotective against staurosporine (STS)-induced apoptosis. However, neuroprotection did not distinguish lithium-responders (Li-Rs) from nonresponders (Li-NRs). Disruption of selected clock genes-period circadian regulator 1 (PER1), basic helix-loop-helix ARNT like 1 (ARNTL, also known as BMAL1), and nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1; also known as REV-ERBα)-with small interfering RNA (siRNA) had distinct effects on apoptosis in mouse neurons and human NPCs. In BD patient NPCs, reduced expression of PER1 and BMAL1 increased apoptosis more in Li-NR NPCs vs. Li-R NPCs. Reduced expression of REV-ERBα caused more extensive apoptosis in BD vs. control NPCs, but did not distinguish Li-Rs vs. Li-NRs. The REV-ERB agonist GSK4112 was neuroprotective in mouse neurons and control NPCs, but did not reduce apoptosis in BD NPCs. Simultaneous treatment of NPCs with STS and GSK4112 revealed BD- and Li-R-associated differences in apoptosis-related gene expression. In summary, the pharmacological effects of lithium in promoting neuroprotection are not sufficient to distinguish between Li-Rs and Li-NRs. However, genetic and pharmacological manipulations of the circadian clock reveal distinct roles in apoptosis in BD patient NPCs, some of which do distinguish Li-Rs and Li-NRs. We conclude that genetic disruption of cellular circadian clocks may predispose neurons to apoptosis preferentially in BD and/or Li-NR. These findings imply that differences in BD between Li-Rs/Li-NRs primarily arise from defining biological characteristics of patient subgroups, not from distinct pharmacodynamic factors following lithium treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207