MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407945992 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.275

Maintenance 4.0 in Mining Trucks: Data Digitalization and Advanced Protocols

2025· article· en· W4407945992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceTruckData miningData scienceAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile mining equipment is essential but susceptible to costly failures. Despite the critical role of predictive maintenance in preventing such failures, existing research often lacks comprehensive frameworks that effectively integrate real-time telemetry data with advanced analytical tools to support decision-making in challenging mining environments. This study, conducted in collaboration with a mining partner, introduces a maintenance 4.0 approach utilizing telemetry data to enhance equipment maintenance and lifecycle management, with a focus on sustainable production. The methodology includes digitizing maintenance data and creating interactive dashboards with Power BI. Machine learning and statistical models enable real-time analysis of telemetry data to detect early failure signs, improving predictive maintenance. Integrating these technologies enhances equipment availability, optimizes maintenance costs, and improves operator health and safety. This approach promotes a digital, intelligent supply chain, fostering efficient and sustainable operations and enhancing the reliability of mining activities in challenging environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it