MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407946193 · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-24-0139.1

The Spanish Plume Elevated Mixed Layer: A Review of Its Use and Misuse within the Scientific Literature

2025· article· en· W4407946193 on OpenAlexafffund
David M. Schultz, Martin V. Young, Daniel J. Kirshbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Environment Research CouncilAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaAspen Center for Physics
KeywordsPlumeLayer (electronics)Environmental scienceMeteorologyGeologyClimatologyGeographyMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Spanish plume is a synoptic pattern associated with deep moist convective storms in western and central Europe. A large-amplitude trough or cutoff low in the jet stream extending to low latitudes produces a long fetch of southerly or southwesterly flow in the lower troposphere across the Iberian Peninsula and into Europe. The preconvective environment is traditionally characterized by an elevated mixed layer of hot dry air with steep lapse rates (i.e., the Spanish plume airstream) overtop a warm surface layer and capping inversion, resembling the loaded-gun convective sounding. A literature review of 102 peer-reviewed journal articles mentioning the Spanish plume is performed (of which 84 have only passing mentions). Some articles correctly employ the original definition of the Spanish plume airstream as the dry elevated mixed layer, whereas others incorrectly apply the term to the surface (sometimes humid) airstream. The origin of the airstream is variously described as the Iberian Peninsula, northern Africa, or both, often unevidenced. Some air in so-called Spanish plumes does not even cross Spain. Descriptions of convective storms in Spanish plume synoptic patterns also are largely unevidenced, with release of instability attributed to various synoptic-scale and mesoscale processes. This review reveals these and other issues with the literature on the Spanish plume, painting a sometimes unevidenced, inconsistent, unclear, and inaccurate picture. The goals are to recommend proper usage of the term Spanish plume and articulate future research questions, specifically related to quantifying interactions with terrain through diurnal sensible heat fluxes and orographic flow modification to produce favorable environments for convective storms. Significance Statement The Spanish plume is a weather pattern favoring intense thunderstorms in the United Kingdom and northwest Europe. It is traditionally associated with a long fetch of southerly or southwesterly winds that transport air heated by the high Spanish Plateau aloft overtop near-surface air. However, some articles use this term incorrectly. Other articles make unevidenced claims or claims that are inconsistent internally or with other literature. This review aims to 1) standardize terminology so that the Spanish plume term is used correctly and 2) improve understanding through recommending research related to how the Spanish Plateau influences thunderstorm development. Consistent understanding and usage of scientific terms is important for clear and concise communication with other scientists, as well as the general public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207