Política hídrica en Veracruz, una mirada desde la coherencia vertical, la transparencia y el alfabetismo hídrico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo tiene como objetivo 1) presentar una compilación actualizada del material legislativo y normativo en materia de política hídrica, planes de desarrollo y programas regionales del agua del nivel nacional al estado de Veracruz, México, con el fin de 2) analizar la coherencia vertical de la política hídrica en dos niveles de gobierno: nacional y estatal en el periodo 2019-2022; así como 3) reforzar la importancia de la transparencia de información bajo el enfoque del alfabetismo hídrico. A manera de una línea del tiempo, presentaremos los resultados de una profusa investigación documental sobre diversas leyes e instrumentos de planeación, al igual que un mapeo de los instrumentos de política pública y organismos con atribuciones en cada nivel de gobierno. Esta compilación pretende llenar el vacío informativo temporal y de contenido en la materia, y documentar y analizar la coherencia vertical de las leyes, planes y programas hídricos oficiales emitidos en el periodo citado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".