MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sparse Network Mean Field Games: Ring Structures and Related Topologies

2024· article· en· W4407949850 on OpenAlexaff
P. Caine, Minyi Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork topologyRing (chemistry)Computer scienceField (mathematics)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer networkMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For sequences of networks embedded in the unit cube $[0,1]^{m}$, (weak) measure limits of sequences of empirical measures of vertex densities (vertexon functions) exist, and the associated (weak) measure limits of sequences of empirical measures of edge densities (graphexon functions) in $[0,1]^{2 m}$ exist, regardless of the sparsity or density of the limit graphs. This paper presents an extension of Graphon Mean Field Game (GMFG) theory to the vertexon-graphexon MFG setup (denoted GXMFG). Specific second order dynamics are introduced for the inter-node influence mediated by the singular part of a network graphexon measure; this is analyzed in the particular cases of a network limit ring topology and a limit rectangular lattice topology. Existence and uniqueness results are presented for the corresponding GXMFG equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207