Tutorial on Recommendation with Generative Models (Gen-RecSys)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This intermediate-level tutorial, titled "Gen-RecSys", merges both industrial and academic perspectives on recent advances in Generative AI for recommender systems (beyond LLMs). It aims to highlight the transformative role of generative models in modern recommender systems, which have significantly impacted the AI field-particularly with the rise of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT-and have contributed to a rapid convergence of the fields of search, data mining, and recommendation. By providing attendees with a modern perspective on GenAI applications in recommendation, the tutorial will emphasize how generative models can drive recommendation by unlocking and interacting with rich data representations, including behavioral, textual, and multi-modal data-knowledge highly transferable across many applications of interest to the WSDM community. Participants will learn about the categorization of generative models in recommender systems based on underlying data modalities: (i) ID-based collaborative models, (ii) text-driven models such as LLMs, and (iii) multi-modal models. Within each category, various deep generative model paradigms (e.g., AR, GAN, diffusion models) will be introduced, along with insights into their application areas. The tutorial will also cover evaluation aspects, including benchmarks, metrics, and assessments of social and ethical impacts and harms. This tutorial presents a condensed version of the industrial and academic work featured in the forthcoming book at FntIR 2024-25, titled "Recommendation with Generative Models [7]," and a shorter version prepared, and presented by the team, see GenRecSys-Survey [6].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".