MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407961828 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2024-0466

Improvement of the geotechnical properties of remoulded quick clay with recycled salt mixtures

2025· article· en· W4407961828 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Julia I. Loshelder, E.W. Ånes, Stefan Ritter, Ingrid Peikli, Simen Bergan, Gudny Okkenhaug

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The instability of quick clay is a contributing factor for landslides within Scandinavia, Canada, and Russia. The addition of salts into quick clay is known to improve the remoulded shear strength and liquid limit. In this study, the mixing of salts recycled from waste incineration fly ash into remoulded quick clay was studied and compared with the incorporation of pure salts for applications in salt wells and for excavation applications. The salts were added as solutions at low concentrations and as solids at high concentrations and stored for 1, 28 or 90 days before testing. Nearly all samples with added salts had a liquid limit that exceeded the water content and a remoulded shear strength, which exceeded 0.5 kPa. The pure potassium chloride had the largest effect, followed by the recycled chloride mixture with the highest concentration of K+. While a change in the geotechnical properties was immediately evident upon the mixing, the effect on the shear strength increased further with increasing storage time. The findings imply that the recycled salts may be used to improve the geotechnical properties of excavated soft clays during the handling and transport to landfills as a viable and low-emission alternative to cementitious binders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207