Investigating the Potential of Tide- and Wind-Induced Currents for Renewable Energy in Northern Vietnam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Renewable energy is increasingly recognized as the trend and future of sustainable societies. With a long coastline of 3,260 km and vast open sea areas, Vietnam has significant potential for clean energy development. This potential is not limited to wind power alone but extends to encompass a broader range of water-related energy sources. In this paper, the authors employ Delft3D software to create a comprehensive hydrodynamic model that investigates the potential of current velocities in Northern Vietnam, particularly the area surrounding Coto Island, influenced by both tidal variations and wind fields. The model's objective is to preliminarily estimate the potential area for tidal stream energy based on the average current speed. The analysis is guided by international technical criteria (EMEC 2009; IEC-TS 2015), which recommend a yearly average current speed exceeding 0.5 m/s. Preliminary findings highlight several promising locations north of Coto Island, where current speeds reach up to 1.2 m/s. Further in-depth research needs to be conducted, considering the development of tidal stream energy technologies, to explore suitable development plans for Vietnam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".