MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Implementation of an adaptive laboratory evolution strategy for improved production of valuable microbial secondary metabolites

2025· article· en· W4407964077 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Martinez, David N. Bernard, Marie‐Christine Groleau, Mylène Trottier, Éric Déziel

Bibliographic record

VenueBioresource Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArmand-Frappier Foundation
KeywordsRhamnolipidSwarming motilityBacteriaBiologySwarming (honey bee)AgarBiofilmSynthetic biologyAgar plateMicrobiologyComputational biologyPseudomonas aeruginosaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbial surface-active agents, such as rhamnolipids, represent an attractive substitute for synthetic surfactants. However, current production bioprocesses are generally inefficient. Adaptive laboratory evolution strategies could offer a promising avenue to improve secondary metabolites production. In the bacterium Burkholderia thailandensis, the social behaviour called swarming motility relies on biosynthesis of rhamnolipids. Since experimental swarming requires lower agar concentrations, we hypothesized that augmenting the agar concentration would constrain the cells to produce more rhamnolipids. Consecutive rounds of B. thailandensis cultivation on swarming media performed with increasing agar concentrations enhanced rhamnolipid production by the evolved populations, with a correlation between rhamnolipid production and agar concentrations. Whole-genome sequencing of superior producing evoluants revealed inactivating mutations in qsmR, which codes for a transcriptional regulator not known to influence rhamnolipid production. Results indicate that QsmR represses rhamnolipid biosynthetic genes transcription. The developed directed evolution strategy could be used to improve biosurfactant yields with other producing bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioresource TechnologySame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207