MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407969899 · doi:10.1063/5.0248972

Angularly resolved spectral reconstruction of x rays via filter pack attenuation

2025· article· en· W4407969899 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Fitzgarrald, Jason Cardarelli, P. T. Campbell, S. Fourmaux, Mario Balcazar, Andre Antoine, N. F. Beier, Qian Qian, Amina Hussein, B. Kettle, Sallee Klein, K. Krushelnick, Y. F. Li, S. P. D. Mangles, G. Sarri, D. Seipt, V. Senthilkumaran, M. J. V. Streeter, A. G. R. Thomas, Y. Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal SocietyFusion Energy SciencesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBetatronPhysicsOpticsStreakingAttenuationFilter (signal processing)PicosecondEnergy (signal processing)LaserBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have designed a new filter pack array to measure angular variations in x-ray spectra during a single shot. The filter pack was composed of repeating identical columns of aluminum and copper filters of varying thicknesses. These columns were located at different positions to measure the spectrum at each corresponding angle. This array was utilized in an experiment to measure the energy evolution of betatron x rays in a laser wakefield accelerator by curving the wakefield with a transverse density gradient, streaking the x rays across the array in front of an x-ray charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. After subtracting the background and "flattening" the image to remove spatial nonuniformities, a critical energy was calculated for each position that produced the best agreement with the measured signal. There was a clear change in critical energy with angle, shedding light on the dynamics of the electrons that traveled through the accelerator. These angles correspond to distinct emission times, covering a timescale of tens of picoseconds. The filter pack was capable of recovering these angular details without the impact of errors introduced by shot-to-shot variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207