MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407969899 · doi:10.1063/5.0248972

Angularly resolved spectral reconstruction of x rays via filter pack attenuation

2025· article· en· W4407969899 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Fitzgarrald, Jason Cardarelli, P. T. Campbell, S. Fourmaux, Mario Balcazar, Andre Antoine, N. F. Beier, Qian Qian, Amina Hussein, B. Kettle, Sallee Klein, K. Krushelnick, Y. F. Li, S. P. D. Mangles, G. Sarri, D. Seipt, V. Senthilkumaran, M. J. V. Streeter, A. G. R. Thomas, Y. Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal SocietyFusion Energy SciencesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBetatronPhysicsOpticsStreakingAttenuationFilter (signal processing)PicosecondEnergy (signal processing)LaserBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have designed a new filter pack array to measure angular variations in x-ray spectra during a single shot. The filter pack was composed of repeating identical columns of aluminum and copper filters of varying thicknesses. These columns were located at different positions to measure the spectrum at each corresponding angle. This array was utilized in an experiment to measure the energy evolution of betatron x rays in a laser wakefield accelerator by curving the wakefield with a transverse density gradient, streaking the x rays across the array in front of an x-ray charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. After subtracting the background and "flattening" the image to remove spatial nonuniformities, a critical energy was calculated for each position that produced the best agreement with the measured signal. There was a clear change in critical energy with angle, shedding light on the dynamics of the electrons that traveled through the accelerator. These angles correspond to distinct emission times, covering a timescale of tens of picoseconds. The filter pack was capable of recovering these angular details without the impact of errors introduced by shot-to-shot variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207