Chanter face à la crise : inventions musicales de Résistantes dans les prisons et camps nazis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore une forme de résistance musicale à la crise extrême et multiforme qu’a représenté la Seconde Guerre mondiale, et plus précisément la détention dans les prisons et les camps nazis, à travers deux ensembles de chansons réécrites sur des airs connus par des Résistantes françaises déportées : d’une part un recueil de chansons de prison inventées entre 1941 et 1944 et rassemblées par la bibliothécaire Yvonne Oddon vers 1945, et d’autre part l’opérette-revue Le Verfügbar aux Enfers, notée en 1944 par l’ethnologue Germaine Tillion dans le camp de Ravensbrück. À travers ces deux cas d’étude de résistance féminine et collective par la musique, nous détaillons cinq grandes fonctions que peut remplir le chant face à une crise d’une telle ampleur : entretenir la mémoire de la liberté, faire circuler l’information, garder prise sur le réel, rire malgré tout et, enfin, alimenter la solidarité et l’espoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".