THE PATH TO COOPERATION. ECONOMIC RELATIONS BETWEEN THE USSR/RUSSIA AND CANADA IN 1989-2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current article delves into the key elements of the economic cooperation between the USSR/Russia and Canada between 1989 and 2003. It is widely known that Russia and Canada are prominent global players due to their substantial size and influence in today’s geopolitical landscape. However, the historical bond between these nations is not only pivotal in their foreign policies but also serves as a vital topic for research aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of the historical past. Although the ideological disparities and the Cold War legacies have complicated the dialogue between them, both sides have demonstrated a willingness to enhance their cooperation for mutual benefit. Official documents, statistical data and scientific works on related topics are analyzed initially using the research method, and then the information obtained is synthesized to reach further objective conclusions. Furthermore, the study examines some fundamental aspects of trade and investment collaboration between the two countries, along with the challenges they encounter in establishing economic partnerships. The findings of this research can provide valuable insight into the overall characteristics of the economic relationship development between the two countries in the early post-Soviet period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".