MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407976926 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.300

Predictors of Inpatient Transfer from the Ambulatory Day Hospital during Outpatient Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

2025· article· en· W4407976926 on OpenAlexaff
Mi Jee Koo, Ashish Masurekar, David Allan, Harold Atkins, Natasha Kekre, Michael Kennah, Christopher Bredeson, Ram Vasudevan Nampoothiri

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbulatoryMedicineTransplantationStem cellEmergency medicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) using ambulatory day hospital services have been shown to be a viable option for transplant programs worldwide. At the Ottawa Hospital, allogeneic transplants are routinely done through our ambulatory day hospital, with the ability to transfer patient care to an inpatient unit as needed. Factors associated with prolonged inpatient admission during these planned outpatient HCTs are mostly unknown. We describe the outcomes of patients undergoing allogeneic HCTs administered through our outpatient day hospital, and sought to identify patient, disease, and treatment characteristics associated with increased inpatient admission during transplant. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of patients undergoing allogeneic HCT between July 2021 and July 2024. The primary outcome evaluated was the factors associated with prolonged inpatient admission days during the transplant admission. Secondary outcomes included reasons for admission, number of admissions, and overall survival . Factors associated with ≤ 5 days of inpatient admission were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis to identify factors independently associated with prolonged inpatient admission (> 5 days) was performed using binary logistic regression . Among the 316 transplants during the study period, 218 (68.9%) were planned outpatient HCT. Females were 38.5% (n=84) and median(range) age at time of transplant was 58(17-75). Baseline characteristics of outpatient HCT patients are shown in Table 1. During transplant 13.3% (n=29) were never admitted, and 59.2% (n=129) had 1 admission and 27.5% (n=60) had more than 1 admission to inpatient unit. Median length of stay in the inpatient unit was 12 days and median time to first admission from start of conditioning was 8 days (Figure 1). The most common reasons for inpatient admission included febrile neutropenia in 41.5% (n=118), non-neutropenic fever in 27.5% (n=60), and severe mucositis in 9.5% (n=27) patients. Estimated OS at day+30 was 99.1% and Day+100 was 91.4%. After multivariate analysis, factors associated with ≤5 days (including 0 days) of inpatient admission were the use of RIC Fludarabine-Busulfan conditioning (HR - 2.1 (95% CI - 1.1-3.9); p = 0.032), Day 0 hemoglobin >110 g/L (HR - 2.0 (95% CI - 1.1-3.9); P = 0.033), and Day 0 albumin >35g/L (HR - 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.6) P = 0.008). Outpatient allogeneic HCT using daily visits to ambulatory day hospital are a feasible and safe way of performing transplants with a significant proportion of patients (13.3%) not requiring any inpatient admission. Enumerating factors associated with inpatient admissions will help to better counsel patients about their potential outcomes and to improve planning and utilization of hospital resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular TherapySame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207