MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407980857 · doi:10.32598/jpr.13.1.902.3

The Biopsychosocial Outcomes of Childlessness or Having One Child on Couple’s Health: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4407980857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marzieh Azizi, Fereshteh Yazdani, Roya Nikbakht, Zohreh Shahhosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatrics Review · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMazandaran University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsBiopsychosocial modelChildlessnessPsychologyPsychotherapistMedicineFertilityPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:The increase in childlessness or having one child is one of the significant changes in the demographic structure, especially in developed countries.Literature review shows that having no child or only one child affects the individual's health from various perspectives.Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the biopsychosocial outcomes of childlessness or having one child on couples' health. Methods:In this systematic review, the research question was about the biopsychosocial outcomes of childlessness or having a single child on couples' health.A systematic literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Iranian database, including SID.We employed the following keywords: "Single child," "childlessness," "health outcome," and "panel study."The quality assessment of the included studies was carried out using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for cohort studies.Results: Nine studies were included in this study.The results were analyzed based on the biopsychosocial perspective.From a biological perspective, women with no child or one child and those who had cesarean section showed poorer physical health scores than women with two children and vaginal delivery.Also, other studies showed the impact of childlessness on the higher probability of cardiovascular disease and mortality, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes in men.From a psychological perspective, the studies included in this field had controversial results.Most of the included studies showed that childless women or women with one child had lower scores in mental health compared to women with two children.In addition, women with a cesarean section also had poorer mental health compared to those with vaginal delivery.Also, childlessness in old adults can cause psychological effects such as less life satisfaction, feelings of more anxiety, and loneliness.From a social perspective, one study showed that childless men are different from fathers with children in terms of participation in society, income level, and life satisfaction. Conclusions:The results of this study indicate that childless couples may have various health problems in biological, psychological, and social aspects, which, in general, negatively affect their quality of life.The results of this study can be a good resource for policymakers and health specialists to design and implement cost-effective interventions to improve fertility indicators among the Iranian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatrics ReviewSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207