Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity Tests of Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) Child Version and SCARED-5-items in Indonesian Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are prevalent among adolescents and significantly impair social and academic functioning. It should be identified early to avoid detrimental effects. This study aimed to validate and assess the reliability of the Indonesian SCARED Child Version for detecting anxiety disorders in Indonesian adolescents. The SCARED Child Version was translated into an Indonesian version according to the standard cross-cultural adaptation method. Reliability was tested with internal consistency test on 123 adolescents aged 12 to 18 years old in Jakarta, which obtained Cronbach's alpha value for SCARED-41 items of .927, and .741 for SCARED-5 items. The content validity test was carried out through a qualitative relevance assessment involving 9 experts and the results showed an average Content-Validity-Index for items of 0.94, Content-Validity-Ratio of 0.88, and Validity-Index for scales of 0.94. The Indonesian version of the SCARED Child Version has good reliability and validity for the early detection of anxiety disorders among Indonesian adolescent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".