MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407985680 · doi:10.1002/sat.1557

Minimum Round‐Trip Time Prediction for Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks

2025· article· en· W4407985680 on OpenAlexaff
Jiayi Chen, Ye Li, Haoye Chai, Jue Wang, Sheng Wu, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLow earth orbitSatelliteRemote sensingOrbit (dynamics)Communications satelliteReal-time computingTelecommunicationsGeodesyAerospace engineeringGeologyAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks, characterized by wide coverage, low latency, and high bandwidth, will be a key component of the future 6G mobile communication networks. However, the periodic handover of satellites in LEO networks will lead to dynamic path changes and fluctuations in propagation delay, affecting the end‐to‐end performance. Establishing a minimum round‐trip time (minRTT) prediction model for LEO satellite networks is crucial for optimizing the design of related mechanisms such as routing, congestion control, and loss recovery. To this end, this paper first conducts a Starlink measurement to collect real‐life data and then proposes a novel model combining hybrid attention (HA) mechanisms with multiscale convolutional neural networks (MCNN) and long short‐term memory networks (LSTM) to explore minRTT prediction. The method utilizes HA to highlight important positional features in the minRTT sequence, while the MCNN and LSTM are exploited to capture the variation patterns of minRTTs, thereby enhancing the prediction accuracy. Experimental results show that the proposed HA‐MCNN‐LSTM model outperforms existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Satellite Communications and NetworkingSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207