MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407987365 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.70109

Engineering Base Changes and Epitope‐Tagged Alleles in Mice Using Cas9 RNA‐Guided Nuclease

2025· article· en· W4407987365 on OpenAlexafffund
Marina Gertsenstein, Lauri G. Lintott, Lauryl M. J. Nutter

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto Centre for Phenogenomics
FundersNational Institutes of HealthOntario GenomicsGenome Canada
KeywordsNucleaseEpitopeCas9RNAAlleleCRISPRBiologyMolecular biologyComputational biologyGeneticsChemistryDNAGeneAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mice carrying patient-associated base changes are powerful tools to define the causality of single-nucleotide variants to disease states. Epitope tags enable immuno-based studies of genes for which no antibodies are available. These alleles enable detailed and precise developmental, mechanistic, and translational research. The first step in generating these alleles is to identify within the target sequence-the orthologous sequence for base changes or the N or C terminus for epitope tags-appropriate Cas9 protospacer sequences. Subsequent steps include design and acquisition of a single-stranded oligonucleotide repair template, synthesis of a single guide RNA (sgRNA), collection of zygotes, and microinjection or electroporation of zygotes with Cas9 mRNA or protein, sgRNA, and repair template followed by screening born mice for the presence of the desired sequence change. Quality control of mouse lines includes screening for random or multicopy insertions of the repair template and, depending on sgRNA sequence, off-target sequence variation introduced by Cas9. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Single guide RNA design and synthesis Alternate Protocol 1: Single guide RNA synthesis by primer extension and in vitro transcription Basic Protocol 2: Design of oligonucleotide repair template Basic Protocol 3: Preparation of RNA mixture for microinjection Support Protocol 1: Preparation of microinjection buffer Alternate Protocol 2: Preparation of RNP complexes for electroporation Basic Protocol 4: Collection and preparation of mouse zygotes for microinjection or electroporation Basic Protocol 5: Electroporation of Cas9 RNP into zygotes using cuvettes Alternate Protocol 3: Electroporation of Cas9 RNP into zygotes using electrode slides Basic Protocol 6: Screening and quality control of derived mice Support Protocol 2: Deconvoluting multiple sequence chromatograms with DECODR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent ProtocolsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207