MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407989003 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.200119

Performance Evaluation of an Inflated Solar Dryer Integrated with Phase Change Materials for Enhanced Drying of Cherry Coffee

2025· article· en· W4407989003 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yeni Eliza Maryana, Daniel Saputra, Gatot Priyanto, Kiki Yuliati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
KeywordsSolar dryerPhase changePhase-change materialEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceAgricultural engineeringSolar energyEngineering physicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of an inflated solar dryer (ISD) integrated with solar air collectors and phase change materials (PCMs) was investigated for the purpose of optimising cherry coffee drying.Experimental trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the dryer with and without the incorporation of PCM.Results indicated that the integration of waste cooking oil as PCM significantly enhanced the drying rate and overall efficiency of the ISD compared to its non-PCM counterpart.Quality assessments revealed that the PCMbased dryer effectively preserved the characteristics of green coffee beans, thereby mitigating quality degradation during the drying process.These findings suggest that the incorporation of PCMs within ISD systems presents a viable alternative for coffee bean drying, particularly in remote regions where climatic conditions are inconsistent and unpredictable.Further research is warranted to explore the long-term viability and scalability of this technology, which holds promise for improving agricultural practices in areas reliant on solar energy for drying processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicFood Drying and ModelingFrench-language works237,207