MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407990000 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112111

Drosophila SPARC collagen IV chaperone-like activity essential for development is unique to the fat body

2025· article· en· W4407990000 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel Delage, Arya Zadhoosh, Theodore J. Brown, Maurice Ringuette

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCell biologyDrosophila (subgenus)Chaperone (clinical)ChemistryBiologyBiochemistryMedicineGenePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

fat body-derived SPARC acts as a chaperone for collagen IV (Col(IV)), enabling their diffusion and incorporation into distal tissue basement membranes (BMs). Disruption of SPARC or Col(IV) production by the fat body is lethal, despite expression by other tissues such as imaginal discs. Wing disc-derived SPARC does not associate with Col(IV) in BMs and is not essential for survival. We show that differential association of fat body- and wing disc-derived SPARC with Col(IV) is not due to differences in SPARC glycosylation nor to the absence of SPARC and Col(IV) co-expression. Further, we demonstrate that SPARC domain II/III produced by the fat body is sufficient for Col(IV) diffusion to both proximal and distal BMs, and rescues lethality associated with loss of SPARC. However, SPARC domain II/III does not diffuse beyond the hemolymph. Thus, the essential Col(IV) chaperone-like activity specific to fat body-derived SPARC is not required beyond the hemolymph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207