MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407991828 · doi:10.3390/buildings15050779

Machine-Learning-Based Analysis of Internal Forces in Reinforced Concrete Conical and Cylindrical Tanks Under Hydrostatic Pressure Considering Material Nonlinearity

2025· article· en· W4407991828 on OpenAlexaff
May Haggag, Mohamed K. Ismail, Ahmed Elansary

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrostatic pressureConical surfaceHydrostatic equilibriumNonlinear systemMaterials scienceInternal pressureStructural engineeringInternal forcesComposite materialEngineeringMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reinforced concrete (RC) tanks are essential for storing liquids and bulk materials across various industries. However, simplified analytical methods fall short in providing an accurate analysis, while traditional methods, such as finite element modeling, can be computationally intensive and time-consuming, especially when dealing with nonlinear material properties and complex geometries, like conical and cylindrical shapes. This highlights the need for a more efficient and simplified analysis approach. Accordingly, the present paper introduces a machine learning (ML) framework as an effective predictive tool for RC conical and cylindrical tanks under hydrostatic pressure. Data from 320 RC conical and cylindrical water tanks, previously analyzed using finite element modeling, were used to train and test various ML models, considering geometrical and material nonlinearities. Four machine learning models—decision trees, random forests, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting—were utilized to predict critical internal forces, including the maximum ring tension force, maximum meridional moment, and maximum meridional axial force. The accuracy of each model was evaluated using different statistical measures. To improve model interpretability and identify key predictors, feature importance techniques were employed to rank the significance of each input variable to the predictions. Furthermore, Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) plots were utilized to visualize the relationships between model inputs and outputs, providing a clearer understanding of the inner workings of the ML models. The combined use of feature importance and ALE plots enhances model transparency by illustrating how specific features contribute to the predictions, thereby supporting the informed application of ML in the structural design and analysis of RC tanks. Ultimately, the framework presented in this study aims to promote the practical application of machine learning in structural engineering, contributing to simpler, more efficient, and accurate analysis and design processes for RC water tanks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuildingsSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207