Predicting Gold Prices: Interactions with Energy Markets, Currencies, and Equity Indices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamic relationships between Gold and several key financial and economic variables, including Crude Oil, Natural Gas, the NASDAQ 100 Index, U.S. Treasury Bonds, the U.S. Dollar Index, and the Housing Price Index. The research uses advanced statistical techniques such as Vector Auto Regression (VAR) to capture the complexities of these interactions and assess how fluctuations in Gold price can influence other variables and overall economic performance. Significant findings indicate that Gold prices are primarily affected by their lagged values and the U.S. Dollar Index, with strong relationships confirmed by high statistical significance. Notably, a rise in the dollar's value correlates with a decrease in Gold prices, while past Gold prices substantially influence current values. The study highlights the interdependencies among these financial indicators, providing valuable insights for investors and policymakers. By understanding these relationships, stakeholders can make more informed decisions in an increasingly interconnected economic landscape. This research contributes to the existing literature on asset correlations and enhances the comprehension of the factors driving Gold prices within the broader context of financial market dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".