MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408007358 · doi:10.14740/cr2016

Computer-Assisted Electrocardiogram Analysis Improves Risk Assessment of Underlying Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke

2025· article· en· W4408007358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dafne Viliani, Alberto Cecconi, Miguel Angel Spinola Tena, Alberto Vera, Álvaro Ximénez‐Carrillo, Carmen Ramos, Pablo Martínez-Vives, Beatriz López‐Melgar, Álvaro Montes Muñiz, Clara Aguirre, José Vivancos, Guillermo J. Ortega, Fernándo Alfonso, Luis Jesús Jiménez‐Borreguero

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineStroke (engine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The detection of underlying paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) can be challenging, and there is great interest in finding predictors of its hidden presence. The recent development of sophisticated software has enhanced the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Our aim was to assess the additional role of a computer-assisted ECG analysis in identifying predictors of AF in patients with CS. Methods: Sixty-seven patients with ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack of unknown etiology were prospectively studied. Their 12-lead digitized ECG was analyzed with dedicated software, quantifying 468 morphological variables. The main clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic variables were also collected. At discharge, patients were monitored with a wearable Holter for 15 days, and the primary outcome was the detection of AF. Results: The median age was 80 (interquartile range (IQR): 73 - 84) and AF was detected in 21 patients (31.3%). After preselecting significant ECG variables from the univariate analysis, a multivariate regression including other significant clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic predictors of AF was performed. Among the automatically analyzed ECG parameters, the amplitude of the R wave in V1 (V1_ramp) was significantly associated with the outcome. The best model to predict AF was composed of age, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) and V1_ramp. This model showed good discrimination capacity (corrected Somer’s Dxy: 0.907, Brier’s B: 0.079, area under the curve (AUC): 0.941) and performed better than the same model without the ECG variable (Somer’s Dxy: 0.827, Brier’s B: 0.119, AUC: 0.896). Conclusions: The addition of computer-assisted ECG analysis can help stratify the risk of AF in the challenging clinical setting of CS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207