MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408011055 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v17n3p122

Impact Mechanism in Circular Public Procurement: Empirical Insights from Traditional Public Procurement and Public Private Partnership in China

2025· article· en· W4408011055 on OpenAlex
Feng Guo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic Procurement and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcurementGeneral partnershipChinaPublic–private partnershipMechanism (biology)BusinessPublic administrationPublic economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceFinanceMarketingLawPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circular Public Procurement (CPP) serves as a policy instrument aimed at advancing circular economy (CE) objectives through public contracting. Despite its growing adoption, the mechanisms underlying its implementation across different procurement types remain insufficiently understood. This study examines the impact of CE policies in both traditional public procurement (TPP) and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects in China. Using data from 45,131 TPP projects and 6,245 PPP projects (2015-2021), a probit regression model analyzes the effects of internal factors, including contract value, procurement method, sector, industry, and contract period, alongside external factors such as attention allocation and marketization. The findings indicate that higher contract values enhance CE policy implementation in TPP, while in PPP projects, larger contract values diminish policy effectiveness by increasing financing pressures. In PPP projects, longer contract periods may alleviate these pressures and facilitate policy implementation. Procurement methods shape policy outcomes differently across procurement types. Competitive bidding strengthens the implementation of CE policies in TPP, while negotiation-based approaches align sustainability goals with financing constraints in PPP projects. Sector- and industry-specific dynamics further influence policy implementation, suggesting that engineering procurement in TPP and transportation and agriculture/forestry PPP projects require more focused attention on CE policy implementation. On the other hand, attention allocation and marketization positively influence policy outcomes by strengthening institutional support and fostering incentives for environmental compliance. Explicit explanations of these relations are provided. This study highlights several key measures to improve the effectiveness of CE policies in China’s public procurement system, including enhancing the legal framework, allocating government attention to PPP projects, promoting market-oriented reforms, and strengthening policy implementation in specific sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it