MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408015701 · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2025.102538

Primary atopic disorders: inborn errors of immunity causing severe allergic disease

2025· review· en· W4408015701 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Vaseghi‐Shanjani, Simran Samra, Pariya Yousefi, Catherine M. Biggs, Stuart E. Turvey

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Immunology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome British ColumbiaMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsImmunologyImmunityMedicineDiseaseImmune systemPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allergic diseases, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies, are driven by dysregulated immune responses, often involving IgE-mediated mast cell and basophil activation, Th2 inflammation, and epithelial dysfunction. While environmental factors are well-known contributors, the genetic components underpinning these conditions are increasingly understood. Traditionally viewed as polygenic multifactorial disorders, allergic diseases can also be caused by single-gene defects affecting the immune system and skin epithelial barrier, leading to profoundly dysregulated allergic responses. These monogenic allergic disorders are collectively referred to as primary atopic disorders or PADs. To date, over 48 single-gene defects have been established to cause PADs. This review highlights (i) the significance of PADs, (ii) the biological pathways involved in the pathogenesis of PADs, (iii) clinical strategies to differentiate PADs from their much more common polygenic counterparts, and (iv) diagnostic strategies for PADs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in ImmunologySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207