MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408016285 · doi:10.4000/13e0m

Agrippa d’Aubigné et la contraction des sonnets. Les sonnets en vers lyriques dans “L’Hécatombe à Diane”

2024· article· en· W4408016285 on OpenAlexaff
François Rouget

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonnetArtHumanitiesLiteraturePoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the sonnets of Agrippa d’Aubigné written in short verses (heptasyllables and octosyllables). In L’Hécatombe, the number of sonnets in lyric verse (generally reserved for odes and odelettes) amounts to ten and constitutes ten percent of the whole. This number invites us to reflect on their internal structures and the relationships they have with the regular sonnets that surround them. The article traces the origins of the sonnet of short verses until the beginning of the 17th century, then analyses the formal aspects of those of d’Aubigné, and finally measures the effect produced by the insertion of these short pieces within a collection where sonnets of long verses dominate. We thus see that the poet sought to extend his prosodic research as far as possible in order to give the forms a varietas which leads to their distortion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207