Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aborder la question de la sobriété énergétique exige à tout le moins un effort d’interdisciplinarité tant l’objet « énergie » est hybride. Hautement matériel, puisque l’énergie est à la base de tout (y compris du vivant), l’objet est aussi social et détermine largement les formes d’organisation sociale et économique basées sur la croissance matérielle, elle-même dépendante… de la quantité d’énergie que reçoit le système. Ceci constituera la première partie de notre réflexion. Dire qu’il nous faut décarboner, pour des raisons vitales, nos modes de production et nos styles de vie ne suffit pas. En effet l'épaisseur du social, la complexité de l’humain opposent des freins et de farouches résistances à l’adoption de modes de vie plus frugaux, lesquels seront abordés dans un second temps. Dans un troisième temps enfin, dans la perspective d’une approche plus pragmatique et méthodologique, nous aborderons les enjeux du métabolisme territorial, mettant en relation les communautés humaines et leur milieu, à partir d’une ethnocomptabilité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".