MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408026021 · doi:10.1111/adj.13062

Oral appliance therapy for snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea: a Practical Guide for Clinical Care

2024· review· en· W4408026021 on OpenAlex
Ramesh Balasubramaniam, Karen McCloy, Fernanda R. Almeida, Peter A. Cistulli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Dental Journal · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSleep (system call)Oral applianceDental careDentistryIntensive care medicineObstructive sleep apneaAnesthesiaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a disorder associated with multiple cardiovascular, metabolic and neurocognitive comorbidities which impact the health and quality of life of patients. Dentists trained in dental sleep medicine have a significant role as part of a collaborative multidisciplinary team led by specialist sleep physicians in the overall management of OSA. Based on the recommendations of the medical team and the patient's preference, dentists have a pertinent role in the provision of oral appliance (OA) therapy for OSA. This narrative review provides a practical guide for OA therapy for snoring and OSA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it