MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408029600 · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101513

DLSR-FireCNet: A deep learning framework for burned area mapping based on decision level super-resolution

2025· article· en· W4408029600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health
FundersJoint Fire Science Program
KeywordsDeep learningResolution (logic)CartographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Widespread availability of Earth observing satellites offer the much-needed information to monitor global wildfire activity. Here, we propose a novel decision level super-resolution deep learning burned area mapping (BAM) model based on the MODIS surface reflectance product, which resolves the limitations associated with both coarse and medium-to-high resolution satellites. Medium-to-high resolution satellite imagery has poor temporal resolution, which is further limited by cloud and aerosol blockage, posing a challenge for timely and accurate BAM. Medium-to-high resolution sensors offer more frequent imagery, but their spatial resolution limits their application for BAM. Our model, dubbed DLSR-FireCNet, comprises two spectral bands (Red and Near-Infrared; 250 m resolution) for deep feature extraction from bi-temporal pre- and post-fire imagery, with a target 30 m resolution BAM. DLSR-FireCNet has a cascading structure to preserve BA edges while alleviating missed detections and false alarms. Trained on 834 large wildfires from 2000 to 2007, the model's performance was rigorously evaluated in 91 out-of-sample large wildfires across the U.S. from 2008 to 2020. With an average Overall Accuracy of 0.98 and a Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.89, DLSR-FireCNet not only outperformed state-of-the-art U-NET++, U-NET+++, Swin-Unet, and HR-Net models but also showed robust performance across various test areas. Additionally, DLSR-FireCNet markedly outperforms available global MCD64A1 and FireCCI burned area products on the test cases. The proposed model structure offers opportunities to develop accurate, medium-to-high resolution global burned area products for improved monitoring and mitigation of wildfires. • DLSR-FireCNet combines decision-level super-resolution with deep learning to map burned areas from MODIS imagery at enhanced resolution. • Transforms coarse satellite data (250m) to finer resolution (30m), enabling more detailed and frequent burned area monitoring. • Achieves superior accuracy (0.98 Overall, 0.89 Kappa) compared to existing models and global burned area products. • Advances the development of more precise global burned area monitoring, supporting improved wildfire management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it