« [Q]uelle plaisanterie que les voyages ! » : Alphonse Karr jardinier-voyageur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En dépit de son titre singulier, le Voyage autour de mon jardin d’Alphonse Karr se définit contre les pérégrinations traditionnelles outre-mer. Au lieu du tour du monde, l’auteur propose le tour de son jardin dans la lignée du « voyage excentrique » de Sterne et Xavier de Maistre. Cet article interrogera les aspects qui témoignent de la rupture avec le modèle conventionnel : la parodie du voyageur traditionnel, de son mode de voyager et du prétérit emphatique de son récit, la valorisation de la découverte de ce qu’on croit bien connaître, l’éloge du proche aux dépens du lointain, etc. On évitera pourtant d’appliquer à l’ouvrage de Karr l’étiquette d’un anti-récit de voyage car, malgré la révocation des règles formelles, la visée documentaire et didactique du genre est conservée et valorisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".