Structure–property relations of binary ferrite melts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molten ferrite systems are used in the smelting and refining processes in steelmaking, to reduce the loss of metals in slags and to accelerate reaction rates. Here, high-energy x-ray diffraction experiments have been performed on aerodynamically levitated molten spheres of 43BaO–57FeOX and 43SrO–57FeOX at 1873 K using laser beam heating. The composition was varied within the range of x = 1–1.5 by changing the oxygen partial pressure of the levitation gas. The corresponding x-ray pair distribution functions have been interpreted using empirical potential structure refinement (EPSR) modeling. In oxygen-rich melts (x = 1.5), our EPSR models indicate very similar structures for the different alkaline-earth liquids, with both the Ba–O and Sr–O coordination numbers to be ∼8.4 and the total Fe–O coordination numbers ∼5.7. However, our models show that in reducing environments, the Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions exhibit very different behaviors in the Ba- and Sr-ferrite liquids. In the Ba-ferrite melt, the Fe3+–O coordination number decreases from 5.7 (at x = 1.5) to 5.2 (at x = 1.07), whereas Fe2+–O remains constant at ∼5.0 across the same compositional range. In the Sr melts, both the Fe2+–O and Fe3+–O coordination numbers rise from ∼5.7 (at x = 1.5) to 6.3 (at x = 1.07). All models show the structures to be heterogeneous with intertwined nanometer sized clusters or channels of Ba/Sr–O and Fe–O polyhedra that grow as oxygen content is reduced. Changes in the viscosity and electrical properties are interpreted in terms of the number of bridging and non-bridging oxygens associated with FeO4 tetrahedra and concentration of charge carriers, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".