Network effects of traumatic brain injury: from infra slow to high frequency oscillations and seizures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have a multitude of effects on neural functioning. In extreme cases, TBI can lead to seizures both immediately following the injury as well as persistent epilepsy over years to a lifetime. However, mechanisms of neural dysfunctioning after TBI remain poorly understood. To address these questions, we analyzed experimental data and developed a biophysical network model implementing effects of ion concentration dynamics and homeostatic synaptic plasticity to test effects of TBI on the brain network dynamics. We focus on three primary phenomena that have been reported in vivo after TBI: an increase in infra slow oscillations (<0.1 Hz), increase in delta (0.1 - 4 Hz) power, and the emergence of high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the gamma range (30 - 100 Hz). We show that the infra slow oscillations can be directly attributed to extracellular potassium fluctuations, while the existence and characterization of HFOs is related to the increase in strength of synaptic weights from homeostatic synaptic scaling. The experimentally found transient increase in delta power can be attributed to the inter-HFO timings. We then show that buildup of high frequency oscillations in the injured region can lead to seizure-like events that span all neurons in the network; additional seizures can then be initiated in previously healthy regions. This study brings greater understanding of network effects of TBI, and how they can give rise to epileptic activity. This lays the foundation to begin investigating how injured networks can be healed and seizures prevented. Significance Statement This project delineates and attempts to explain abnormalities seen in human brain following traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI can lead to the development of seizures, which may last a lifetime and often become resistant to pharmaceutical treatments. The study identified key mechanisms responsible for occurrence of three characteristic changes in spatio-temporal network dynamics following TBI. This model provides predictions that can serve as a testing ground for potential therapeutic approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".